Chairman's View: Picking Priorities (Dec. 6, 2018)

Chairman’s View: Picking priorities

DECEMBER 6, 2018 BY JOHN ENGEL. CHAIRMAN, TOWN COUNCIL

“I do have to pick my priorities. Nobody can do everything.” — Ray Kurzweil

We held the first joint offsite meeting among the four funding bodies (Board of Selectmen, Town Council, Board of Education, Board of Finance) in over 10 years, an important step toward approaching our town and school budgets with a spirit of cooperation.

Critical takeaways: 10 of us think that the budget is driven by the Board of Finance, 10 believe we all share it, and nine votes were scattered among Town Council, Board of Education and Board of Selectmen. It’s a shared responsibility but clearly, the BOF is driving the bus. Most of us believe that the budget should come in at an increase of between 0% and 1% this year, a big change since last year’s debates between 2% and 3.5%. We agreed a joint meeting should bookend the budget process every year: November and May. And, support was nearly unanimous for conducting a professional town-wide survey.

We had our last forum on town buildings in April. It is time to listen again. The Town Council is scheduling a public hearing for Wednesday, Jan. 9, to solicit input from the public and discuss our buildings within the context of the 5-year Capital Plan. Why is it necessary and why now? In April the focus was on preservation of important buildings and the need to decrease building expenses. There have been several articles over the last six months floating different possibilities for the Library, the repurposing or demolishing of Irwin House, purchasing the Covia Building, renovating the old Police Station (or repurposing it as housing), selling the Vine Cottage and renting the Outback. These options are interrelated and now we know the costs. Some of these initiatives should be put in the Capital Plan and others removed. We need to get serious and specific about our priorities and make sure they are accurately reflected in the Capital Plan and this year’s budget, reflecting the towns people’s appetite.

The Library was put in the 5-Year Capital Plan for $5 million by First Selectman Robert Mallozzi. It would help the Library board secure additional private funding and allow them to “think big” if we put the Library in the plan for $10 million. That is incredibly hard to do during the revaluation, but if we were to plan for a matching gift, 2-1 behind private donations, and stretch that commitment from three years to potentially five years it works within current Board of Finance guidance. I believe a $10 million earmark has the support from the majority of the selectmen and Town Council. If the Library cannot raise $20 million then Town Hall is not committed. But, by signaling a cap of $5 million in the capital plan, the Board of Finance is essentially killing the project. If you feel strongly that a new library will be transformational to the health of our downtown, let the Town Council and Board of Finance know.

Chairman's View: Not to Eliminate Buildings, But to Eliminate Expense (Jan. 22, 2019)

Chairman’s View: ‘Not to eliminate buildings, but to eliminate expense’

JANUARY 22, 2019 BY JOHN ENGEL, CHAIRMAN, TOWN COUNCIL

In the fourth week of a federal government shutdown it’s a good time to reflect on the state of Connecticut and town government. There is cause for optimism.

Newly elected State Sen. Alex Bergstein announced the State is pursuing a policy of “shared risk.” I asked “Shared between whom?” because last year’s plan was to add a $4 million burden onto New Canaan.  The senator clarified she meant shared between the union workers and the State. If Gov. Ned Lamont agrees and the renegotiation and restructuring is finally underway, then this is great news.

Our grand list went down 7%: First Selectman Kevin Moynihan says he can bring in a town budget growing 0% to 1%. Is this because of a 1-year anomaly in the debt service? Does this assume only 5% rise in health care costs? Or, are we making the hard choices? It should be 0%. 

The Brick Barn: A relatively minor building in our portfolio, it has taken on outsized proportions for our citizens. We cannot ignore the fact that Town Council and two selectmen demanded to see alternatives to demolition. We owe it to the electorate to explain why we must spend $65,000 on demolition when the New Canaan Preservation Alliance says it is fully funded and ready to restore now at no cost to the town. The Board of Selectmen is at a stalemate until the first selectman convinces his fellow selectmen or they convince him. If a stalemate then the demo money is returned.

The Police Station: It feels reckless of us to talk about a new $16 million to $20 million police station between Saxe and the YMCA when there is only $7.8 million in our capital budget. And, that is the absolute worst location. Where is the money coming from? What other locations are being considered? Will this spending come at the expense of library or Waveny renovations? How far does $7.8 million get us?

Irwin House: First, it was to be a museum. Then, offices for nonprofits. Then Board of Finance members asked for demolition costs. The Town Council was understandably anxious to hear that we were talking about amendments to the deed with no explanation. Russ Kimes made an excellent case that it be repurposed as the school administration building, saving us $300,000 per year.

Vine Cottage: Make this charming building part of the historic district. Put out a Request for Proposals by May 1. There are businesses that will sign a long-term ground lease and fix it up. Any proposal that preserves Town Hall parking and which transfers restoration responsibility to the tenant should be considered.

Keep these buildings at no expense and with benefit to the public. The most important thing is not to eliminate buildings, but to eliminate expense.